NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
| NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. |
| HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY |
| 1:2014cv01734 |
| October 23, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
211
CLOSED JUDGMENT in favor of the Defendant and against the Plaintiff on the Plaintiff's claim under the Lanham Act. All remaining claims and counterclaims in this case are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 2/27/2017.(CBU)
|
|
Filing
139
ENTRY ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COUNTERCLAIM: For the reasons set forth above, the Court finds that good cause exists and justice requires amendment in this instance. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIE S IN PART Hattenhauer's Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim. The Court orders Hattenhauer to refile its Amended Counterclaim consistent with this Entry, deleting the "breached the covenant of good faith and fair dealing" langu age in paragraph 51. The Court also requests that Hattenhauer fix the graphic in paragraph 9 so as to reflect the definition of "Gross Sales" found in the franchise agreements ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORAMATION***. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/19/2016. (DW)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER on Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order: Noble Roman's motion for a protective order (Dkt. 130) is GRANTED. The court ORDERS that Hattenhauer is prohibited from obtaining by its subpoenas the discovery sought from Privet Fund. The court DENIES Noble Roman's request for fees (see Order for additional information). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 3/24/2016. (SWM)
|
|
Filing
76
ENTRY on Various Motions. Hattenhauer's Motion to Deny Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as Premature or, in the alternative, to Continue or Stay the Motion Until Completion of Discovery Pursuant to Rule 56(d) 57 is GRANT ED. Noble Roman's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 54 is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Noble Roman's Motion for Leave to File Amended Reply 66 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to docket Noble Roman's Amended Reply, found at Dkt. No. 66-1 (See Entry). Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 7/27/2015. (MAC)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER denying Defendant's 20 Motion to Dismiss and denying Defendant's 35 Motion Requesting Oral Argument. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 4/3/2015. (BGT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. v. HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HATTENHAUER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | Kirsten M. Ahmad |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NOBLE ROMAN'S, INC. | |
| Represented By: | John Zhi Huang |
| Represented By: | Andrew M. McNeil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
