FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA et al v. MH LEASING, LLC et al
| MIGUEL CEBALLOS ALVAREZ, FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA and ANA ROMAN |
| FR CHINOOK, LLC, FR COMMUNITY, LLC, MH LEASING, LLC, SHILOH ESTATES and PAMELA ZIEMER |
| 1:2015cv00817 |
| May 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Accommodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER ADOPTING AS MODIFIED 104 THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT - Noting no objections, the Court ADOPTS the recommendations that Defendants MH Leasing, LLC and FR Communities LLLP be dismissed, and the Court DI SMISSES WITH PREJUDICE all claims against MH Leasing, LLC and FR Communities LLLP. Also noting no objections, the Court ADOPTS the recommendations that the state law negligence and harassment claims be dismissed, and that the federal conspiracy claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) be dismissed. The Court DISMISSES WITH PREJUDICE these claims. The Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs' objection and ADOPTS the recommendation that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 83 ) be granted and that Plaintiffs' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 86 ) be denied as to Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(c). The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to this claim and DENIES Plainti ffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment in its entirety. The Court MODIFIES the recommendation as to Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f). The Court OVERRULES Plaintiffs' objection and ADOPTS the recommendation, as to the incidents involving Greta Willis and Carol Willis, that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. The Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to those claims. The Court DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary J udgment as to the incident involving Murray. The Court OVERRULES Defendants' objections and ADOPTS the recommendations as to Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b) and 42 U.S.C. § 3617. Defendants' Motion for Summary J udgment as to these claims is DENIED. The Court OVERRULES Defendants' objection and ADOPTS the recommendation as to Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff FHCCI is GRANTE D and Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs Roman and Alvarez is DENIED.Therefore, remaining for trial are Plaintiffs' claims under 42 U.S.C. § 3604(b), 42 U.S.C. § 3617, 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f), but only as to the incident involving Murray, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, but only as to Plaintiffs Roman and Alvarez. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/26/2017.(LBT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
