WEST v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION (INDYGO) - MV TRANSIT et al
TAMARA K. WEST |
BILLY GRICE, PAULA HASKIN, AMY HOCKMAN, INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION (INDYGO) - MV TRANSIT and JAIME NIEVES |
1:2015cv00821 |
May 26, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Tim A. Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ENTRY ON PENDING MATTERS - Plaintiff was not required to move to file an amended complaint as that request had already been granted. In reality, Filing No. 25 is an amended complaint, and the Court will treat it as such. The Clerk is directed t o terminate the Motion to Amend Employment Discrimination and re-docket Filing No. 25 as Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, filed as of the date of this Entry. Because she is proceeding in forma pauperis, the Amended Complaint is subject to sc reening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). If not previously accomplished, Plaintiff is to effectuate service of the summons and the Amended Complaint on the sole defendant, MV Transportation, Inc. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/5/2016.(JLS) |
Filing 23 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT - For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Tamara K. West's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Filing No. 22). West is ORDERED to re-file her Amended Complaint, submitted at Filing No. 22-2, after she has added the appropriate case caption at the beginning of the Amended Complaint, which should identify the parties, this Court, and the case number, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. West is further ORDERED to effectuate service of a summons and the Amended Complaint on the defendants. Additionally, the Court DENIES as moot the Motion to Dismiss filed by IPTC (Filing No. 17) because the Amended Complaint resolves the issue raised in that motion by removing IPTC as a defendant. Thus, Indianapolis Public Transportation Corporation is DISMISSED with prejudice as a defendant in this case. Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/1/2016. (JLS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.