EDSON v. DREYER & REINBOLD INC.

EDSON v. DREYER & REINBOLD INC.

Plaintiff:	KARLA EDSON
Defendant:	DREYER & REINBOLD INC.
Case Number:	1:2015cv00861
Filed:	June 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA:Family and Medical Leave Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 23, 2017	Filing 87 ENTRY ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE - For the foregoing reasons, Edson's Motions in Limine (Filing No. 75 ; Filing No. 76 ) are DENIED, and DRI's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 69 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. An order in limine is n ot a final, appealable order. During the course of the trial, if the parties believe that evidence being offered is inadmissible or irrelevant, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/23/2017. (JLS)
February 1, 2017	Filing 59 ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 55 ) is ADOPTED and Dreyer & Reinbold 9;s Objection (Filing No. 57 ) is OVERRULED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 36 ) is DENIED and the matter remains scheduled for Final Pretrial Conference on May 24, 2017 and Trial on June 19, 2017. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017.(JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 23, 2017

Filing 87 ENTRY ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE - For the foregoing reasons, Edson's Motions in Limine (Filing No. 75 ; Filing No. 76 ) are DENIED, and DRI's Motion in Limine (Filing No. 69 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. An order in limine is n ot a final, appealable order. During the course of the trial, if the parties believe that evidence being offered is inadmissible or irrelevant, counsel may approach the bench and request a hearing outside the presence of the jury. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/23/2017. (JLS)

February 1, 2017

Filing 59 ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the foregoing reasons, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Filing No. 55 ) is ADOPTED and Dreyer & Reinbold 9;s Objection (Filing No. 57 ) is OVERRULED. Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 36 ) is DENIED and the matter remains scheduled for Final Pretrial Conference on May 24, 2017 and Trial on June 19, 2017. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/1/2017.(JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: EDSON v. DREYER & REINBOLD INC.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: DREYER & REINBOLD INC.
Represented By:	Jeffrey B. Halbert
Represented By:	Philip R. Zimmerly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: KARLA EDSON
Represented By:	Daniel LaPointe Kent
Represented By:	Mary Jane Lapointe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?