HAYNES v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY et al
| RAY K. HAYNES |
| JOYCE M. ALEXANDER, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY, THOMAS A. BRUSH, GARY M. CROW, THOMAS F. GIERYN, GERARDO M. GONZALEZ, INDIANA UNIVERSITY, TERRENCE C. MASON, MICHAEL A. MCROBBIE, ELIZA PAVALKO and LAUREN K. ROBEL |
| 1:2015cv01717 |
| October 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Larry J. McKinney |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
166
ORDER - The Court GRANTS Defendants' 117 Motion to Strike. Dr. Haynes' 148 Surreply Motion is DENIED as MOOT. Further, the Court STRIKES the full expert reports of Drs. Perna and Greenwald submitted with Dr. Haynes' Surreply in O pposition. Dkts. 161-2, 161-3. Dr. Haynes' 165 Motion to Reconsider is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Finally, Defendants' 66 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 8/18/2017. (GSO)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY AND MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT EVIDENCE - The Court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Dr. Haynes' 130 Motion for Leave; and DENIES Dr. Haynes' 132 Motion to Supplement. Withi n seven (7) days from the entry of this Order, Dr. Haynes shall file a surreply to address Defendants' counsel's affidavit and Defendants' theory on qualified immunity. Dr. Haynes is reminded that any evidence submitted in the surreply must be limited to the affidavit and the qualified immunity arguments and any extraneous evidence will be stricken completely. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/31/2017. (GSO)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER - The Court DENIES the following: Dr. Haynes' Motion for Sanctions (dkt. 70 ), Dr. Haynes' Motion to Compel (dkt. 107 ), Dr. Haynes' Motion for Rule 56(d) Relief (dkt. 109 ), Defendants' Motion to Strike Response in Op position to Motion (dkt. 84 ), and Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Surreply In Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions (dkt. 79 ). The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part the Defendants' Motion for Leave to Submit Documents for In Camera Review (dkt. 75 ), and GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Entry of Protective Order with modifications (dkt. 78 ). The Court finds that the documents submitted for in camera review are not privileged and therefore Defenda nts are ORDERED to produce the four (4) documents in question within seven (7) days of the date of this Order. Defendants shall also file a modified protective order for the Court's signature within seven (7) days of this Order. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 7/7/2017. (JKS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
