MILLER v. THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. et al
| DEE ANN MILLER |
| SPRINGLEAF FINANCE, INC. DISABILITY PLAN and THE HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE CO. |
| 1:2016cv00166 |
| January 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Denise K. LaRue |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
Order on Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 50, 52) - Hartford's Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 52 is granted, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 50 is denied, Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument ECF No. [ 54] is denied as moot, and Plaintiff's claims are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. Hartford's request for attorney's fees under 29 U.S.C. 1132(g) is denied. Final judgment will be entered separately. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/25/2019. (JDC)
|
|
Filing
34
CLOSED DISMISSED - ENTRY ON MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE REMAND AND MOTION TO STRIKE. For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Administrative Remand and to Stay Proceedings (Filing No. 25), and the Court DENIES Mi ller's Motion to Strike (Filing No. 30). The matter is remanded to Hartford for additional administrative review. This matter is administratively closed, upon motion of either party to re-open the case. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/19/2017.(JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
