HUDSON-HARRIS v. FISHER et al
Plaintiff: KESHA R. HUDSON-HARRIS
Defendant: GEORGE H. FISHER, NONTE and AMANDA PICKRELL
Case Number: 1:2016cv00245
Filed: January 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER OF DISMISSAL - The Court determines that dismissal of this action with prejudice is appropriate in light of the fact that Hudson-Harris initiated the administrative procedure on February 14, 2017, and that process is still ongoing. Hudson-Ha rris has not exhausted her administrative remedies, and the Court must allow the pending administrative procedure to run its course. Therefore, the prior dismissal without prejudice is converted to a dismissal with prejudice, and final judgment will issue under separate order. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/23/2017.(JLS)
February 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting 14 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. However, Hudson-Harris's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Hudson-Harris is granted leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Entry to sufficiently allege her efforts to pursue and exhaust administrative remedies or to explain how such efforts were futile. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/15/2017 (dist made) (CBU)
March 28, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENTRY Discussing Supplement and Directing Further Proceedings. The IDEA claims asserted against Principal Amanda Pickrell and Mrs. Nonte are dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The Court construes the pro se pla intiff's IDEA claim as being brought against the Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis and the clerk shall substitute that entity as the sole defendant. That is the only claim that shall proceed in this action. The clerk i s designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to defendant Board of School Commissioners of the City of Indianapolis in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Copies to Parties via U.S. Mail (S.E.). Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/28/2016.(MAC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HUDSON-HARRIS v. FISHER et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEORGE H. FISHER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NONTE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AMANDA PICKRELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: KESHA R. HUDSON-HARRIS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?