AZTEC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. et al v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
| AZTEC ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. and TECNICA Y PROYECTOS S.A. |
| AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY |
| 1:2016cv01657 |
| June 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Default |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
ORDER - Aztec-TYPSA's 54 Motion for Leave to File Amended Exhibits is GRANTED IN PART such that [50-3] is STRICKEN and DENIED IN PART such that the belatedly submitted exhibit filed with that motion, [54-3], will not be considered. For the rea sons stated herein, the Court GRANTS Aztec-TYPSA's 32 Motion for Summary Judgment and DENIES the Co-Sureties' 47 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court DENIES Aztec-TYPSA's 49 Motion to Strike Allegations and Affirmative Defenses in the Co-Sureties' Answer, as well as the Co-Sureties' 59 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer. Final judgment in favor of Aztec-TYPSA in the amount of $4,678,451.61 plus prejudgment interest shall enter accordingly. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/18/2017. (JRB)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INTERVENE - Isolux-Corsn's 35 Motion to Intervene is DENIED. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 1/4/2017. (GSO)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER - For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES the Co-Sureties' 9 Motion to Dismiss Or, In the Alternative, Stay Litigation and Compel Arbitration. The Co-Sureties are directed to answer or otherwise respond to Aztec-TYPSA's C omplaint pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court also asks the assigned Magistrate Judge to hold a conference with the parties to discuss whether an early dispositive motions deadline may be preferable to more quickly resolve some or all of the issues in the case. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/17/2016. (GSO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
