GUNN v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
||TRAVIS KALANICK and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
||June 24, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Mark J. Dinsmore
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|January 27, 2017
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 19 Motion to Compel Arbitration, Strike Class Allegations and Dismiss the Action. See Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 1/27/2017. (SWM)
|July 8, 2016
ENTRY ON JURISDICTION - Therefore, the Plaintiff is ORDERED to file a Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement that establishes the Court's jurisdiction over this case. This statement should specifically identify the correct threshold amount in controversy required for a class action in federal court and the amount in controversy in this action. This statement also should identify the citizenship of Defendant Travis Kalanick. This Supplemental Jurisdictional Statement is due fourteen (14) days from the date of this Entry. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/8/2016.(JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?