DICKERSON v. COLVIN
||SSA (Court Use Only)
||October 19, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Tim A. Baker
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 19, 2017
ENTRY REVIEWING THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION - Plaintiff K.D.,1 on behalf of J.D., a minor, appeals the denial of J.D.'s application for supplemental security income ("SSI") benefits. K.D. applied for benefits on J.D's behal f on June 25, 2013. [Filing No. 5-5 at 3.] The claim was initially denied in August 13, 2013, [Filing No. 5-4 at 2], and upon reconsideration on September 26, 2013, [Filing No. 5-4 at 10]. Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") Albert Velazqu ez held a hearing on March 30, 2015, and issued a decision on April 17, 2015, concluding that J.D. was not disabled. [Filing No. 5-2 at 12-24.] The Appeals Council denied a request for review, rendering the ALJ's decision the final decision o f the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration ("Commissioner") for the purposes of this review. [Filing No. 5-2 at 2.] K.D. filed this action on behalf of J.D. under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), requesting that the Court review th e ALJ's denial. [Filing No. 1 .] The Court can find no legal basis presented by K.D. to reverse the ALJ's decision that J.D. was not disabled during the relevant time period. Therefore, the decision below is AFFIRMED. Final judgment shall issue accordingly. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 6/19/2017.(RSF)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?