CARTER v. SUPERINTENDENT

CARTER v. SUPERINTENDENT

Petitioner:	WILLIAM CARTER
Respondent:	SUPERINTENDENT
Case Number:	1:2016cv02873
Filed:	October 21, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Matthew P. Brookman
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 14, 2017	Filing 25 ENTRY DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSAND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Carter's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus must be DENIED and the action DISMISSED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/14/2017. (Copy mailed to William Carter) (MEJ)
April 17, 2017	Filing 15 ENTRY Discussing Habeas Petition and Directing Further Proceedings - Given the foregoing, the respondent shall have through April 28, 2017, in which to (1) submit the video evidence to the Court; and (2) provide an explanation for the withholding of the video from the petitioner in accordance with the above cited law. If the respondent is unable to do both of these things, the petitioner's disciplinary conviction at issue must be vacated and his good-time credit and credit-earning class must be restored. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/17/2017.(JLS)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 14, 2017

Filing 25 ENTRY DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUSAND DIRECTING ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT. Carter's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus must be DENIED and the action DISMISSED. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/14/2017. (Copy mailed to William Carter) (MEJ)

April 17, 2017

Filing 15 ENTRY Discussing Habeas Petition and Directing Further Proceedings - Given the foregoing, the respondent shall have through April 28, 2017, in which to (1) submit the video evidence to the Court; and (2) provide an explanation for the withholding of the video from the petitioner in accordance with the above cited law. If the respondent is unable to do both of these things, the petitioner's disciplinary conviction at issue must be vacated and his good-time credit and credit-earning class must be restored. (See Order.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/17/2017.(JLS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CARTER v. SUPERINTENDENT
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: WILLIAM CARTER
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: SUPERINTENDENT
Represented By:	Abigail T. Rom
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?