WASHINGTON v. THE MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR et al
||CHIEF OF THE INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARION COUNTY PROSECUTOR and MAYOR OF THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS/MARION COUNTY
||November 2, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Debra McVicker Lynch
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 18, 2017
ORDER - For the reasons described above, the Court GRANTS Mr. Washington's Motion to Certify a Class, 3 , as modified. The Court GRANTS Mr. Washington's Motion for Summary Judgment, 31 . It concludes that Indiana Code Section 34-24-1-1(a) (1), read in conjunction with Indiana Code provisions of the same chapter, violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments. The Defendants are hereby PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from enforcing Indiana Code Section 34-24-1-1(a)(1), as read in conjunction with Indiana Code provisions of the same chapter. The Defendants are hereby further ordered to inform forthwith all other affected Indiana state governmental entities of this injunction. The Court DENIES Defendants' Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, 40 . In light of this ruling, Mr. Washington's Motion for Preliminary Injunction, 5 , is DENIED AS MOOT. Final Judgment shall issue accordingly. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 8/18/2017. (JRB)
|March 7, 2017
ORDER denying Defendant's 24 Motion to Dismiss. SEE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 3/7/2017. (JRB)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?