CAGE v. COLVIN
||ANTHONY B. CAGE
||CAROLYN W. COLVIN
||SSA (Court Use Only) and USM (Court Use Only)
||November 2, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Mark J. Dinsmore
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 28, 2017
ENTRY ON JUDICIAL REVIEW: The standard for review of the Commissioner's denial of benefits is narrow. The Court reviews the record as a whole, but neither does it reweigh the evidence nor substitute its judgment for t he ALJ's. Terry v. Astrue, 580 F.3d 471, 475 (7th Cir. 2009). Where, as here, the ALJ did not build a logical bridge between the evidence in the record and the ALJ's conclusion, the Court must remand. As the Court cannot find a complete logical bridge in the ALJ's five-step sequential analysis, the Commissioner's decision is vacated and REMANDED for further proceedings. See Entry for additional information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 8/28/2017.(SWM)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?