GIBSON v. THE GEO GROUP et al
LIONEL GIBSON |
S. BECKER, ROBERT BUGHER, KEITH BUTTS, J. GILMER, LAWRENCE ONYESONWU, ANGIE PRICE, L. STORM and THE GEO GROUP |
1:2017cv00092 |
January 10, 2017 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Indianapolis Office |
Denise K. LaRue |
Larry J. McKinney |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Entry Discussing Amended Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, And Directing Service of Process - The clerk is designated pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c) to issue process to Officer Lawrence Onyesonwu, Officer J. Gilmer, Officer S. Becker, a nd Angie Price in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). The clerk shall update the docket to reflect that claims against the GEO Group, Keith Butts, Robert Bugher, and Lt. Storm have been dismissed from this action. (SEE ORDER). Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 4/21/2017. (copies via US Mail as instructed) (JKS) |
Filing 8 ENTRY Rejecting Complaint Based on Misjoinder And Directing Further Proceedings. The complaint, as presented, must be rejected. The plaintiff shall have through March 28, 2017, in which to file an amended complaint incorporating only properly related claims. (See Order.) Signed by Judge Larry J. McKinney on 2/27/2017. Copy sent to Plaintiff via US Mail.(LDH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.