HILL v. BEDWELL, et al
Plaintiff: ASHER B. HILL
Defendant: JENNIFER ADAMS, DAVID BEDWELL, LEE HOEFLING, FRANK LITTLEJOHN, ALICIA MCGRAIL, GARY MCMILLIN, DAN RUSSELL, TIM SHIRLEY and DONNA WALKER
Case Number: 1:2017cv00173
Filed: January 18, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ENTRY Discussing Plaintiff's Request for Preliminary Injunctive Relief - At this preliminary stage of the litigation, the Court finds that Mr. Hill has not shown that he is likely to succeed on the merits or that he is likely to suffer irrepa rable harm if preliminary relief is not granted. He has not shown that immediate injunctive relief is necessary to avoid serious physical harm. The extraordinary relief sought by Mr. Hill in his request for a preliminary injunction is denied. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/3/2017.(JLS)
January 23, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY Discussing Complaint, Dismissing Insufficient Claims, and Directing Further Proceedings - The clerk shall update the docket to reflect the dismissal of defendants Hoefling and Littlejohn. The claims against the remaining defendants shall procee d.It is unclear from the record whether the defendants' motion for enlargement of time to respond to the complaint was ruled on in the state court. The defendants shall have through February 10, 2017, in which to respond to the complaint. The de fendants shall also have through February 10, 2017, in which to respond to Mr. Hill's request for preliminary injunctive relief. Mr. Hill will then have twenty-one (21) days in which to respond only to the defendants' response to his request for preliminary injunctive relief. (See Entry.) Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 1/23/2017.(JLS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: HILL v. BEDWELL, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JENNIFER ADAMS
Represented By: Christopher Douglas Cody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAVID BEDWELL
Represented By: Christopher Douglas Cody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LEE HOEFLING
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FRANK LITTLEJOHN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALICIA MCGRAIL
Represented By: Christopher Douglas Cody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GARY MCMILLIN
Represented By: Nikki G. Ashmore
Represented By: Amanda Elizabeth Fiorini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DAN RUSSELL
Represented By: Nikki G. Ashmore
Represented By: Amanda Elizabeth Fiorini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIM SHIRLEY
Represented By: Christopher Douglas Cody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DONNA WALKER
Represented By: Nikki G. Ashmore
Represented By: Amanda Elizabeth Fiorini
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ASHER B. HILL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?