WALKER v. ZATECKY
| ANTONIO WALKER |
| DUSHAN ZATECKY |
| PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv00572 |
| February 22, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ENTRY Dismissing Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Because Mr. Walker's habeas petition shows that he is not entitled to the relief he seeks, the action is summarily dismissed pursuant to Rule 4. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 3/27/2017.(JLS)
|
|
Filing
5
ENTRY Directing Further Proceedings - The petitioner shall have through March 28, 2017, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The petitioner shall have through March 28, 2 017, in which to supplement his petition for a writ of habeas corpus by submitting a copy of the reports issued in the proceeding which is challenged in this case, ISR16-10-0108, including a copy of 1) the conduct report, 2) the screening report, 3) the disciplinary hearing report, and 4) the administrative appeal(s) and any response thereto. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 2/27/2017.(JLS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
