WOODCOCK v. SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
||CARL W. WOODCOCK
||SUPERINTENDENT NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
||April 21, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Denise K. LaRue
||Tanya Walton Pratt
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|November 30, 2017
Entry Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - Mr. Woodcock's petition for a writ of habeas corpus must be denied and the action dismissed. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 11/30/2017. (Copy mailed to Petitioner) (MEJ)
|May 1, 2017
Entry and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE (Disciplinary). The petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma paueris [dkt. 2 ] is granted. The assessment of an initial partial filing fee is not feasible at this time. The petitioner's motion for a ppointment of counsel [dkt. 3 ] is denied. The motion for production of documents [dkt. 4 ] is denied. The petitioner's custodian is directed to answer the allegations of the petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in doing so shall show cause why the relief sought by the petitioner should not be granted insofar as the petitioner challenges the deprivation of a recognized liberty interest affecting the fact or the duration of his confinement. This shall be done within forty-five (45) days after the date this Entry is signed. The petitioner shall have twenty (20) days after service of such answer or return to order to show cause on him in which to reply. (See Entry.) Copy to Petitioner via U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 5/1/2017.(JLS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?