ABDUL EL-MALIK BEY ALI v. PETERSON et al
| MUFTI ABDUL EL-MALIK BEY ALI |
| ANDREW COLE, DREW LIEBEL and MATT PETERSON |
| PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv01571 |
| May 12, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
ORDER - granting in part and denying in part 35 Motion for Summary Judgment; The motion is granted insofar as the Court finds that Mr. Abdul failed to exhaust available administrative remedies concerning access to halal hygiene products and dis misses his claim on that issue. The motion is denied as to Mr. Abdul's claims regarding congregate prayer, halal diet, and accommodations for Ramadan and ritual feasts. Moreover, the record before the Court shows that Mr. Abdul is entitled to summary judgment with respect to the affirmative defense of exhaustion on these claims. The Defendants shall have through March 11, 2019, to respond to the Court's proposal and either (a) show cause why summary judgment should not be entered in Mr. Abdul's favor as discussed above, or (b) withdraw the affirmative defense of exhaustion. The defendants shall not view this order as an invitation to present evidence or legal authority that they could have presented in support of this motion. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 3/1/2019. (CKM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
