JONES v. SUPERINTENDENT
||RALPH E. JONES
||August 21, 2017
||US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
||Tim A. Baker
||Sarah Evans Barker
|Nature of Suit:
||Habeas Corpus (General)
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 27, 2017
ENTRY - Petitioner Ralph Jones ("Mr. Jones") has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenging a prison disciplinary proceeding identified as ISR 16-11-0079. He states in his petition that he suffered a grievous loss in the form of a demotion in credit class and lost 100 days of credit time. This action is dismissed pursuant to Rule 4. Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. *** SEE ORDER ***. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 9/27/2017. Copy Mailed. (CKM)
|August 25, 2017
SHOW CAUSE ORDER - The petitioner, Ralph E. Jones, shall have through September 25, 2017, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. The petitioner Ralph Jones has filed a peti tion for writ of habeas corpus challenging the disciplinary proceeding identified as ISR 16-11-0079. He states in his petition that he suffered a grievous loss in the form of a demotion in credit class and lost 100 days of credit time. However, th ere are two problems with Mr. Jones' petition. For the reasons stated in this Order, Mr. Jones shall have through September 25, 2017, to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/25/2017.(APD)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?