DEAN v. COX et al
| JORGE LUIS DEAN |
| SHERIFF DOUG COX, KATHLEEN HASH, JOHN JESSEN and DAVID LUTZ |
| 1:2017cv02894 |
| August 24, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
Entry Dismissing Action and Directing Entry of Final Judgment - No federal claim has been identified, the events that form the basis of this civil action occurred in 2010, and because this civil action cannot be used to challenge a state court rul ing, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The dismissal of the complaint shall now result in the dismissal of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Judgment consistent with this Entry shall now issue. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 12/7/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)
|
|
Filing
8
Entry Dismissing Complaint and Directing Further Proceedings - 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is granted. Plaintiff shall have through September 26, 2017, in which to show cause why Judgment consistent with this Entry should not issue. See entry for details. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/29/2017. (Copy mailed to Plaintiff) (MEJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
