LANE v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

LANE v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Plaintiff:	TONI YVONNE LANE
Defendant:	INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Case Number:	1:2017cv03320
Filed:	September 19, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 13, 2019	Filing 78 ENTRY - The Court GRANTS Indianapolis Public School's Motion for Summary Judgment 56 as to Ms. Lane's claims for disparate pay, hostile work environment, and retaliation. The Court DENIES Indianapolis Public School's Motion as to Ms. Lane's narrow failure-to-accommodate claim regarding the period between April 13, 2017 and May 8, 2017. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties to explore the possibility of resolving the sole remaining claim via negotiated resolution. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/13/2019. (JDH)
February 1, 2018	Filing 25 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - This matter is before the Court on Defendant Indianapolis Public Schools' ("IPS") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ("Motion to Dismiss"). [Filing No. 12 .] IPS se eks dismissal of Plaintiff Toni Yvonne Lane's Complaint, [Filing No. 1 ], which was filed pro se, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies in part and grants in part IPS' Motio n to Dismiss. Because Ms. Lane conceded in her Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss that Ms. Lane is not seeking any relief under Title VII, [Filing No. 24 at 3], IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane' ;s Title VII claims is GRANTED. The Court will only address IPS' arguments relating to the sufficiency of Ms. Lane's ADA claim. For the reasons stated herein, IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane's ADA claim, [Filing No. 12 ], is DENIED. For the foregoing reasons, IPS' Motion to Dismiss [12.] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Ms. Lane is hereby ordered to file an Amended Complaint by February 15, 2018. Defendant need only file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/1/2018. (APD)

Date Filed

Document Text

February 13, 2019

Filing 78 ENTRY - The Court GRANTS Indianapolis Public School's Motion for Summary Judgment 56 as to Ms. Lane's claims for disparate pay, hostile work environment, and retaliation. The Court DENIES Indianapolis Public School's Motion as to Ms. Lane's narrow failure-to-accommodate claim regarding the period between April 13, 2017 and May 8, 2017. The Court requests that the Magistrate Judge confer with the parties to explore the possibility of resolving the sole remaining claim via negotiated resolution. (See Entry). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/13/2019. (JDH)

February 1, 2018

Filing 25 ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS - This matter is before the Court on Defendant Indianapolis Public Schools' ("IPS") Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim ("Motion to Dismiss"). [Filing No. 12 .] IPS se eks dismissal of Plaintiff Toni Yvonne Lane's Complaint, [Filing No. 1 ], which was filed pro se, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons stated below, the Court denies in part and grants in part IPS' Motio n to Dismiss. Because Ms. Lane conceded in her Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss that Ms. Lane is not seeking any relief under Title VII, [Filing No. 24 at 3], IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane' ;s Title VII claims is GRANTED. The Court will only address IPS' arguments relating to the sufficiency of Ms. Lane's ADA claim. For the reasons stated herein, IPS' Motion to Dismiss with respect to Ms. Lane's ADA claim, [Filing No. 12 ], is DENIED. For the foregoing reasons, IPS' Motion to Dismiss [12.] is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. Ms. Lane is hereby ordered to file an Amended Complaint by February 15, 2018. Defendant need only file a responsive pleading to the Amended Complaint. (See Order). Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 2/1/2018. (APD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LANE v. INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: INDIANAPOLIS PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Represented By:	Caridad Austin
Represented By:	Craig M. Borowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: TONI YVONNE LANE
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?