BONILLA v. SEVIER ET AL
| LUIS BONILLA |
| Officer D BEACH, CORIZON MEDICAL, OFFC. P. GUFFEY, Officer T LEONARD, A MCCULLOUGH, MED 1 SOLUTIONS and MARK SEVIER |
| WESTVILLE E-FILE(COURT USE ONLY) |
| 1:2017cv04327 |
| November 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Mark J. Dinsmore |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER Granting In Forma Pauperis Status, Dismissing Complaint and Directing further proceedings. The plaintiff shall have through March 26, 2018, in which to file an amended complaint. In organizing his complaint, the plaintiff may benefit from u tilizing the Court's complaint form. The clerk is directed to include a copy of the prisoner civil rights complaint form along with the plaintiff's copy of this Entry. Any amended complaint should have the proper case number, 1:17-cv- 04327-SEB-MJD and the words "Amended Complaint" on the first page. If an amended complaint is filed as directed above, it will be screened. If no amended complaint is filed, this action will be dismissed for the reasons set forth above. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 2/20/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint)(MAC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
