MOSLEY v. TARGET CORPORATION

MOSLEY v. TARGET CORPORATION

Plaintiff:	GUATEMION MOSLEY
Defendant:	TARGET CORPORATION
Case Number:	1:2017cv04658
Filed:	December 18, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office:	Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge:	Mark J. Dinsmore
Presiding Judge:	Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 20, 2019	Filing 65 ENTRY - GRANTING TARGET'S 42 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. In order to survive summary judgment, Indiana law requires that a plaintiff alleging retaliatory discharge present evidence that directly or indirectly implies the necessary inferen ce of causation between the filing of a worker's compensation claim and the termination. Mosley did not present any such evidence. Therefore, Target's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to Count III of Mosley's Complaint--hi s claim for retaliatory discharge. For the reasons stated above, Target's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 42 ) is GRANTED as to all claims. Final judgment will follow in a separate order. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/20/2019. (NAD)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 20, 2019

Filing 65 ENTRY - GRANTING TARGET'S 42 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. In order to survive summary judgment, Indiana law requires that a plaintiff alleging retaliatory discharge present evidence that directly or indirectly implies the necessary inferen ce of causation between the filing of a worker's compensation claim and the termination. Mosley did not present any such evidence. Therefore, Target's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted as to Count III of Mosley's Complaint--hi s claim for retaliatory discharge. For the reasons stated above, Target's Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 42 ) is GRANTED as to all claims. Final judgment will follow in a separate order. (See Entry.) Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 8/20/2019. (NAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MOSLEY v. TARGET CORPORATION
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: GUATEMION MOSLEY
Represented By:	Heather R. Falks
Represented By:	David W. Stewart
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: TARGET CORPORATION
Represented By:	Emily L. Connor
Represented By:	Alan L. McLaughlin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?