ROTHHAAR v. BERRYHILL
| ERICH R. ROTHHAAR |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL |
| SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only) |
| 1:2017cv04738 |
| December 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| Richard L. Young |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation ECF No. 22 - On January 22, 2019, Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker issued his Report and Recommendation on Plaintiff's Request for Remand, finding that the Administrative Law Judge adequately considered Plaintiff's statement under SSR 16-3p and sufficiently analyzed the opinion of Plaintiff's treating physician. ECF No. 22 The parties were allowed to file objections under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); none wer e filed. Therefore, the Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the parties' briefs, and the administrative record, including the Administrative Law Judge's decision, now adopts the Report and Recommendation. The Court concludes that the ALJ's decision is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed. Final judgment will be entered. Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 2/22/2019.(JDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
