FIGGS et al v. GEO GROUP, INC.

Plaintiff: DAVID CORBIN and DAMARCUS FIGGS
Defendant: GEO GROUP, INC.
Case Number: 1:2018cv00089
Filed: January 11, 2018
Court: Indiana Southern District Court
Office: Indianapolis Office
Referring Judge: Matthew P. Brookman
Presiding Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1446 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
September 24, 2018 25 Opinion or Order of the Court ENTRY ON PLAINTIFFS' 12 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY - In Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant GEO Group's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs cited the district court case Menocal et al v. GEO Group, Inc., 113 F.Supp.3d 1125 (D. Colo. 2015), a case which denied a for-profit private company's motion to dismiss federal labor trafficking and state unjust enrichment claims brought against it. Additionally, the United States District Court of Col orado granted class certification of the labor trafficking and unjust enrichment claims. Plaintiffs wish to file supplemental authority, concerning the Tenth Circuit's affirmance of the class certification in the district court case. Men ocal et al. v. GEO Group, Inc., No. 17-1125 (10th Cir. Feb. 9, 2018) (Filing No. 12-1). Defendant has not responded. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority is GRANTED. (Filing No. 12 ). In Plain tiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant GEO Group's Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs cited the district court case Menocal et al v. GEO Group, Inc., 113 F.Supp.3d 1125 (D. Colo. 2015), a case which denied a for- profit private company's motion to dismiss federal labor trafficking and state unjust enrichment claims brought against it. Additionally, the United States District Court of Colorado granted class certification of the labor trafficking and unjust enrichment claims. Plai ntiffs wish to file supplemental authority, concerning the Tenth Circuit's affirmance of the class certification in the district court case. Menocal et al. v. GEO Group, Inc., No. 17-1125 (10th Cir. Feb. 9, 2018) (Filing No. 12-1). Defendant has not responded. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' unopposed Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Authority is GRANTED. (Filing No. 12 ) Copies per distribution list. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/24/2018. (NAD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: FIGGS et al v. GEO GROUP, INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAVID CORBIN
Represented By: David W. Frank
Represented By: Christopher Carson Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DAMARCUS FIGGS
Represented By: David W. Frank
Represented By: Christopher Carson Myers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEO GROUP, INC.
Represented By: Adam Garth Forrest
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?