MHG HOTELS, LLC v. STUDIO 78, LLC et al
| MHG HOTELS, LLC |
| PALMER ENGINEERING COMPANY, PROMUS ENGINEERING LLC, SBI ENGINEERS PLLC and STUDIO 78, LLC |
| BLUROCK CONCRETE, LLC, HORIZON BANK, N.A., HOTELS OF SPEEDWAY, LLC and MIDWEST STEEL FAB, LLC |
| MHG HOTELS, LLC |
| STUDIO 78, LLC |
| STUDIO 78, LLC |
| 1:2018cv01199 |
| April 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Indianapolis Office |
| Tim A. Baker |
| William T. Lawrence |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
Entry on Third Party Defendant SBI Engineers PLLCs Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 163) - For the reasons explained above, SBIs motion for summary judgment ECF No. 163 is granted in part. Studio 78's claims for breach of professional standard of care and for breach of contract relating to the ceiling heights are dismissed on the merits with prejudice. The motion is otherwise denied. ***SEE ENTRY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*** Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/19/2020. (JDC)
|
|
Filing
103
ORDER denying 82 Motion to Sever. Weighing the totality of the factors considered, the Court holds that severance would not be proper at this time, and DENIES the Defendant's motion to sever 82 . The motion may, of course, be renewed if the circumstances of the case change in a material way. Signed by Judge William T. Lawrence on 1/16/2019. (CBU)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
