SCOTT-MANNA v. BOSWELL
Petitioner: AHKEEM SCOTT-MANNA
Respondent: DIANE BOSWELL and Warden Keith Butts
Case Number: 1:2018cv02218
Filed: July 19, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Office: Indianapolis Office
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Jane Magnus-Stinson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2018 Filing 6 RETURN TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, re #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Keith Butts.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A:Chronological Case Summary, State v. Scott-Manna, Cause No. 45G03-1212-MR-000008, #2 Exhibit B:Chronological Case Summary, Scott-Manna v. State, Cause No. 45G03-1602-PC-000002, #3 Exhibit C:Appellate Case History, Scott-Manna v. State, Cause No. 45A03-1411-CR-391, #4 Exhibit D:Appellate Case History, Scott-Manna v. State, Cause No. 18-PC-00467, #5 Exhibit E:Opinion, Scott-Manna v. State, Cause No. 45A03-1411-CR-391 (Ind. Ct. App., decided July 27, 2015), #6 Exhibit F:Petition to Transfer, Scott-Manna v. State, Cause No. 45A03-1411-CR-391)(Flores, Henry)
August 21, 2018 Filing 5 RESPONSE re #3 Order to Show Cause, filed by Petitioner AHKEEM SCOTT-MANNA. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(APD)
July 26, 2018 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Henry A. Flores, Jr on behalf of Respondent DIANE BOSWELL. (Flores, Henry)
July 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Ahkeem Scott-Manna's petition for a writ of habeas corpus challenges his conviction and sentence in State Court case number 45G03-1212-MR-00008. The petitioner shall have through August 20, 2018, in which to either pay the $5.00 filing fee for this action or demonstrate his financial inability to do so. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts, the respondent is ORDERED to enter an appearance by August 3, 2018. The respondent is further ORDERED to answer the petition by September 21, 2018. Any motion for an extension of time filed by the respondent must include the petitioner's anticipated release date. Show Cause Response due by 9/21/2018. (See Entry). Copy to petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 7/24/2018.(APD)
July 20, 2018 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
July 19, 2018 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by AHKEEM SCOTT-MANNA. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(HET)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SCOTT-MANNA v. BOSWELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: DIANE BOSWELL
Represented By: Henry A. Flores, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Keith Butts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: AHKEEM SCOTT-MANNA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?