BOWLING v. LOGAN et al
| Steven Bowling |
| Lee, T. Randall, L. Blair, Saylor, Logan and R. BLAIR |
| 1:2018cv02596 |
| August 22, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 18, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP062103 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $2.78, paid by Plaintiff. (REO) |
Filing 6
ORDER - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; The plaintiff shall have through September 24, 2018, in which to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 8/24/2018. cc Finance (CKM)
|
| Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Carson Myers on behalf of Plaintiff Steven Bowling. (Myers, Christopher) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Ilene M. Smith on behalf of Plaintiff Steven Bowling. (Smith, Ilene) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis , filed by Plaintiff Steven Bowling. (Smith, Ilene) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against L. Blair, Lee, Logan, T. Randall, Saylor, filed by Steven Bowling. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons All Defendants, #3 USM 285 Form All Defendants)(Smith, Ilene) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
