HARP v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.
| STACY HARP |
| DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. |
| 1:2018cv02849 |
| September 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Debra McVicker Lynch |
| Tanya Walton Pratt |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 12/4/2018 11:30 AM (Eastern Time) in Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch. The court will contact counsel by separate email through the court's electronic filing system with the call-in information to be used to participate in the conference. Read this entire order carefully; it sets out the court's expectations for the conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 11/7/2018.(SWM)
|
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service, filed by STACY HARP. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. served on 10/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Proof of Service)(Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 11 Diversified Consultant's Inc.'s ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC..(Pisani, Daniel) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.. (Pisani, Daniel) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Automatic Initial Extension, filed by Defendant DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. (Pisani, Daniel) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel W. Pisani on behalf of Defendant DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.. (Pisani, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Morgan I. Marcus on behalf of Defendant DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.. (Marcus, Morgan) |
| Filing 6 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC.. (HET) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexander J. Taylor on behalf of Plaintiff STACY HARP. (Taylor, Alexander) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Marwan Rocco Daher on behalf of Plaintiff STACY HARP. (Daher, Marwan) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Omar Tayseer Sulaiman on behalf of Plaintiff STACY HARP. (Sulaiman, Omar) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC., filed by STACY HARP. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5063738) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sulaiman, Omar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HARP v. DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DIVERSIFIED CONSULTANTS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel W. Pisani |
| Represented By: | Morgan I. Marcus |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: STACY HARP | |
| Represented By: | Marwan Rocco Daher |
| Represented By: | Omar Tayseer Sulaiman |
| Represented By: | Alexander J. Taylor |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
