TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al.
| TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. |
| METROPOLITAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA DIVISION II and THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA |
| 1:2019cv00040 |
| January 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James Patrick Hanlon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Submission - TENDER OF BOARD RECORD, filed by Plaintiff TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Return to Verified Petition for Judicial Review, #2 Exhibit B - Board Record - Part A (pages 1-76), #3 Exhibit C - Board Record - Part B (pages 77-122), #4 Exhibit D - Transcript)(Moore, John) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Motion to Withdraw Attorney Appearance. Attorney Thomas J.O. Moore withdrawn. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 2/5/2019. (TMB)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION to Withdraw Attorney Appearance , filed by Defendants METROPOLITAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA DIVISION II, THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, Thomas) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Bowman on behalf of Defendants METROPOLITAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA DIVISION II, THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA. (Bowman, Daniel) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - Initial Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 4/2/2019 at 10:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. The information needed to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a Proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 1/23/2019.(JRB)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File Record of the zoning decision to 2/13/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 1/15/2019. (JRB)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) , filed by METROPOLITAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA DIVISION II, THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA.(Moore, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 Submission of Additional State Court Records. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(DWH) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to February 13, 2019 to File Board Record, filed by Plaintiff TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Moore, John) |
| Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC.. (Moore, John) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE , filed by Defendants Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County Indiana, Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion County, Indiana Division II, re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 State Court Record) (Moore, Thomas) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas J.O. Moore on behalf of Defendants Consolidated City of Indianapolis/Marion County Indiana, Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals of Marion County, Indiana Division II. (Moore, Thomas) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D10-1812-MI-049155, filed by All Defendants. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5222250) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record Petition, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Exhibit C, Exhibit D, Appearance, Summons, Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Certificate of Issuance of Summons, Motion for Enlargement of Time, Exhibit A, #2 State Court Record Petition, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Moore, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, et al. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: TENTH STREET BAPTIST CHURCH, INC. | |
| Represented By: | John J. Moore |
| Represented By: | Brian J. Tuohy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: METROPOLITAN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF MARION COUNTY, INDIANA DIVISION II | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J.O. Moore |
| Represented By: | Daniel Bowman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J.O. Moore |
| Represented By: | Daniel Bowman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
