CAKORA v. 3M COMPANY et al
Plaintiff: JOHN CAKORA
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Case Number: 1:2019cv01079
Filed: March 18, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 19 Remark - The Southern District of Indiana receives email notice from the Clerk of the Northern District of Florida regarding electronic case transfer. This case was received electronically by the Northern District of Florida on 4/22/2019 and was assigned case number 3:19-cv-00884 in the receiving court. (MAC)
April 19, 2019 Filing 18 Transfer Letter to Clerk of the Northern District of Florida. Case transferred electronically to Northern District of Florida, IN RE: MDL 2885 on April 17, 2019. (MAC)
April 19, 2019 Filing 17 CLOSED TRANSFER to the Northern District of Florida IN RE: 3M COMBAT ARMS EARPLUG PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL. 2885 per CTO 2. (MAC)
April 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to 6/21/2019 for the Defendant Aearo Technologies LLC to respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 4/19/2019. (CBU)
April 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time to 6/21/2019 for the Defendant 3M Company to respond the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Doris L. Pryor on 4/19/2019. (CBU)
April 16, 2019 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 6/21/19 in which to #1 Notice of Removal Respond to Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Pittman, Alexandria)
April 15, 2019 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to June 21, 2019 to Respond to Complaint Pending Further Order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Transfer Order and Conditional Transfer Order, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Mortimer, Renee)
March 25, 2019 Filing 12 Submission of Additional State Court Records received from the Marion County Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC)
March 25, 2019 Filing 11 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 21, 2019 Filing 10 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 19, 2019 Filing 9 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
March 18, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Alexandria Hanauer Pittman on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Pittman, Alexandria)
March 18, 2019 Filing 7 CONSENT to Removal by AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC identifying Corporate Parent 3M COMPANY for AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC.. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Adam Arceneaux on behalf of Defendant AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC. (Arceneaux, Adam)
March 18, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott B. Cockrum on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Cockrum, Scott)
March 18, 2019 Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 18, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Renee J. Mortimer on behalf of Defendant 3M COMPANY. (Mortimer, Renee)
March 18, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, Civil Division 11, case number 49D11-1902-CT-006269, filed by 3M COMPANY. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5339227) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - State Court Record (Docket Sheet, Appearance, Complaint, Summons to 3M, Summons to Aearo, Notice on Order of Consolidation, Service as to Summons to 3M, Service as to Summons to Aero, Appearance, Appearance, Motion for Enlargement, Motion to Deem, Order on Consolidated Cases, Appearance, Motion for Enlargement, Motion to Deem, Appearance, Order Granting Motion to Deem, Order Granting Motion for Enlargement), #2 Exhibit 2 - Operative Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mortimer, Renee)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CAKORA v. 3M COMPANY et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JOHN CAKORA
Represented By: Jason Ruskin Reese
Represented By: Timothy Loren Karns
Represented By: Stephen M. Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Represented By: Adam Arceneaux
Represented By: Alexandria Hanauer Pittman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Represented By: Scott B. Cockrum
Represented By: Renee J. Mortimer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?