BELL v. ARDAGH GROUP S.A.
Plaintiff: ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL
Defendant: ARDAGH GROUP S.A.
Case Number: 1:2019cv01171
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Mark J Dinsmore
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING MOTION - United States Magistrate Mark J. Dinsmore is hereby designated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) to issue a report and recommendation on Plaintiff's combined Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses Asserted in Respondents' Answer Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 12(b)(6) and 12(f) at Docket No. #13 . Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 7/8/2019. Motions referred to Mark J. Dinsmore.(NAD)
July 2, 2019 Filing 19 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss, filed by Plaintiff ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dismissal and Notice of Rights, #2 Exhibit B - Letter dated 2/26/19 re Unlawful Termination of Antoinette Bell)(NAD)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 18 UNIFORM PROTECTIVE ORDER: *SEE ORDER.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/28/2019. (Distribution to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.) (GD)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL SCHEDULE AND DISCUSSING DISCOVERY IN PRO SE LITIGATION: This Order sets the schedule for how this action shall proceed. Part I sets forth the pretrial deadlines. Part II discusses various aspects of discovery. Facilitating the discovery process can be difficult, and this Order is issued in an effort to help explain and streamline the process for the parties. The parties should carefully read this Order. Discovery due by 2/7/2020. Dispositive Motions due by 3/13/2020. *SEE ORDER FOR ALL DEADLINES & ADDITIONAL INFORMATION*. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/28/2019. (Distribution to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.) (GD)
June 28, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore: Initial Pretrial Conference held on 6/28/2019. Court will enter case schedule, by separate order. Defendant's counsel orally requested Court to issue standard uniform protective order. Following discussion & Court's explanation of same to Plaintiff, Court GRANTED Defendant's request. Court will enter uniform protective order in this matter, by separate order. Court & parties also discussed #15 Plaintiff's Motion for Privacy Protection Made with the Court. Court discussed motion with Plaintiff & explained that this proceeding is presumptively open to public. Plaintiff's motion provides no basis to deviate from that general rule. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion #15 is DENIED. Conference concluded without further order. *SEE ORDER.* Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. (Distribution to Plaintiff via U.S. Mail.) (GD)
June 26, 2019 Filing 15 MOTION for Privacy Protection Made With the Court, filed by Plaintiff ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. (NAD)
June 25, 2019 Filing 14 AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Defenses, filed by Defendant ARDAGH GROUP S.A.. (McDermott, Brian)
June 10, 2019 Filing 13 Combined MOTION to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Affirmative Defenses Asserted in Respondent's #11 Answer Pursuant to FED. R CIV. PRO 12(b)(6) and 12(f), filed by Plaintiff ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. (NAD) Modified on 6/13/2019 (NAD).
June 5, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 12 SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Pretrial Conference set for 6/28/2019 03:00 PM (Eastern Time) in room #243, United States Courthouse, 46 E. Ohio Street, Indianapolis, Indiana before Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore. The Court will ask the parties if there is any reason that the Court should not enter the following orders in this case (SEE ORDER). Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 6/5/2019.(SWM)
June 4, 2019 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint and Defenses, filed by ARDAGH GROUP S.A..(McDermott, Brian)
April 24, 2019 Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed, filed by ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. ARDAGH GROUP S.A. waiver sent on 4/3/2019. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(NAD)
April 22, 2019 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARDAGH GROUP S.A.. (McDermott, Brian)
April 22, 2019 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Caitlin S. Schroeder on behalf of Defendant ARDAGH GROUP S.A.. (Schroeder, Caitlin)
April 22, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian L. McDermott on behalf of Defendant ARDAGH GROUP S.A.. (McDermott, Brian)
April 3, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE of Lawsuit & Waiver Issued by Clerk to: Ardagh Group S.A. (NAD)
April 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ENTRY - GRANTING #2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISCUSSING ACTION, AND DIRECTING SERVICE. While in forma pauperis status allows a plaintiff to proceed without pre-payment of the filing fee, the plaintiff remains liable for the full fees. The filing fee for in forma pauperis litigants is $350.00. No payment is due currently; however, the $350.00 balance remains owing. Because Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(c)(3) requires the Court to order service for Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Clerk is designated pursuant to Rule 4 (c)(3) to issue process to Defendant Ardagh Group S.A. in the manner specified by Rule 4(d). Process shall consist of the Complaint (Filing No. 1), applicable forms (Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of Service of Summons and Waiver of Service of Summons), and this Entry. Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 4/2/2019. (NAD)
April 1, 2019 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL (NAD)
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (HET)
March 22, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. (HET)
March 22, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARDAGH GROUP S.A., filed by ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Charge of Discrimination and EEOC document)(HET)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: BELL v. ARDAGH GROUP S.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTOINETTE TAKIA BELL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ARDAGH GROUP S.A.
Represented By: Brian L. McDermott
Represented By: Caitlin S. Schroeder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?