LOVELESS v. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
Plaintiff: ROBIN LOVELESS
Defendant: ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
Case Number: 1:2019cv03803
Filed: September 6, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Sarah Evans Barker
Referring Judge: Debra McVicker Lynch
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; Pursuant to Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice filed by the Plaintiff in this cause, this cause is hereby dismissed with prejudice, and each party shall bear its own respective costs and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, incurred in connection with this cause. Signed by Judge Sarah Evans Barker on 10/22/2019. (CKM)
October 21, 2019 Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss with prejudice, filed by Plaintiff ROBIN LOVELESS. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order of dismissal)(Steinkamp, John)
October 1, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Directing Filing of Documents Authorizing Dismissal: The court has been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case. Therefore, all pending motions, if any, are now DENIED AS MOOT and all previously ordered dates relating to discovery, filings, schedules, conferences, and trial, if any, are VACATED. Within thirty days of the date of this entry, counsel for the plaintiff shall file a motion to dismiss this cause and submit an order for the Court's signature ordering the dismissal of this action or a stipulation of dismissal (consistent with the agreement of the parties). Signed by Magistrate Judge Debra McVicker Lynch on 10/1/2019.(SWM)
September 16, 2019 Filing 5 RETURN of Service, filed by ROBIN LOVELESS. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC served on 9/12/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John)
September 9, 2019 Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
September 9, 2019 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC. (AKH)
September 6, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff ROBIN LOVELESS. (Steinkamp, John)
September 6, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC, filed by ROBIN LOVELESS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5616787) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The April 24, 2018, letter sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - The January 2, 2019, dunning letter sent to Plaintiff, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: LOVELESS v. ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ABSOLUTE RESOLUTIONS INVESTMENTS, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ROBIN LOVELESS
Represented By: John Thomas Steinkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?