BANKS v. CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.
Veronica Banks |
City Optical Company, Inc and CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC. |
1:2019cv03901 |
September 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Doris L Pryor |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint , filed by CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC..(Bankovich, Candace) |
Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.. (Bankovich, Candace) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Parties' First Extension of Time, filed by Defendant CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.. (Bankovich, Candace) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Candace A. Bankovich on behalf of Defendant CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.. (Bankovich, Candace) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Celia Pauli on behalf of Defendant CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC.. (Pauli, Celia) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to CITY OPTICAL COMPANY, INC. (JDH) |
Filing 4 PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Robert Panico on behalf of Plaintiff Veronica Banks. (Panico, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City Optical Company, Inc, filed by Veronica Banks. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5628121) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Panico, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.