CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. NOVEMBAL USA INC.
| CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. and CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. |
| NOVEMBAL USA INC. |
| 1:2019cv03944 |
| September 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1338 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Initial Filing in lawsuit sent to Director of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Appendix Table of Exhibits, #3 Exhibit 1 - '442 Patent, #4 Exhibit 2 - '171 Patent, #5 Exhibit 3 - Edie Assignment Agreement, #6 Exhibit 4 - Moll Assignment Agreement, #7 Exhibit 5 - Benecke Assignment Agreement, #8 Exhibit 6 -CSI Drawing, #9 Exhibit 7 - Email to Nestle, #10 Exhibit 8 -CSI Presentation, #11 Exhibit 9 - Letter from Novembal, #12 Exhibit 10 - Letter from CSI, #13 Exhibit 11 - Letter from Counsel to CSI, #14 Exhibit 12 - Email String, #15 Exhibit 13 - Email from Counsel, #16 Exhibit 14 - Novembal Drawing) (JDH) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney Daniel H. Shulman for CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/19/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Appear pro hac vice. Attorney David L. Bernard for CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark J. Dinsmore on 9/19/2019 (dist made) (CBU)
|
| Filing 8 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 7 Submission of Exhibit A Bernard Certification to the Motion for David L. Bernard to Appear Pro Hac Vice [Document #4), filed by Plaintiff CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. identifying Corporate Parent Reynolds Group Holdings, Inc. for CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC... (Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel H. Shulman to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5634513), filed by Plaintiff CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certification, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Attorney(s) David L. Bernard to Appear pro hac vice (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0756-5634500), filed by Plaintiff CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeff M. Barron on behalf of Plaintiff CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET , filed by Plaintiff CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Barron, Jeff) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against NOVEMBAL USA INC., filed by CLOSURE SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5634432) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - '442 Patent, #2 Exhibit 2 - '171 Patent, #3 Exhibit 3 - Edie Assignment Agreement, #4 Exhibit 4 - Moll Assignment Agreement, #5 Exhibit 5 - Benecke Assignment Agreement, #6 Exhibit 6 -CSI Drawing, #7 Exhibit 7 - Email to Nestle, #8 Exhibit 8 -CSI Presentation, #9 Exhibit 9 - Letter from Novembal, #10 Exhibit 10 - Letter from CSI, #11 Exhibit 11 - Letter from Counsel to CSI, #12 Exhibit 12 - Email String, #13 Exhibit 13 - Email from Counsel, #14 Exhibit 14 - Novembal Drawing, #15 Appendix Table of Exhibits)(Barron, Jeff) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
