SHANNON et al v. LOUDON COUNTY TRUCKING, INC. et al
JULIANNE E. SHANNON and MICHAEL D. SHANNON |
JAMES BURCHAM and LOUDON COUNTY TRUCKING, INC. |
1:2019cv03987 |
September 20, 2019 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by All Plaintiffs. JAMES BURCHAM served on 9/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Receipt certified mail receipt)(Winingham, William) |
Filing 7 RETURN of Service by CMRRR, filed by All Plaintiffs. LOUDON COUNTY TRUCKING, INC. served on 9/28/2019. (Attachments: #1 Receipt certified mail receipt)(Winingham, William) |
Filing 6 TRIAL PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES before Judge James Patrick Hanlon. (DWH) |
Filing 5 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to JAMES BURCHAM, LOUDON COUNTY TRUCKING, INC.(REO) |
Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Plaintiffs JULIANNE E. SHANNON, MICHAEL D. SHANNON. (Winingham, William) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by William E. Winingham on behalf of Plaintiffs JULIANNE E. SHANNON, MICHAEL D. SHANNON. (Winingham, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-5640744) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Winingham, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.