WIRTZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Plaintiff: NATHAN WIRTZ
Defendant: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOYE HOLMES
Case Number: 1:2020cv00118
Filed: January 13, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Nature of Suit: Forfeit/Penalty: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 13, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John Joseph Coomes on behalf of Plaintiff NATHAN WIRTZ. (Coomes, John)
January 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER - Nathan Wirtz has filed an Emergency Petition for an Injunction and a Writ of Mandamus, which the Court construes as a complaint. Dkt. 1. The complaint alleges that the Court has jurisdiction because the United States is a defendant, but it does not allege why venue is proper in the Southern District of Indiana. Mr. Wirtz SHALL FILE a statement explaining why venue is proper in this district by February 14, 2020. Mr. Wirtz IS RESPONSIBLE for proper service of the complaint on Defendants. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. If Mr. Wirtz chooses to pursue injunctive relief, he must file a motion specifying the type of relief sought and the factual and legal basis for it. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 65. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 1/13/2020. Copy sent to Defendants via US Mail. (DWH)
January 13, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH)
January 13, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, JOYE HOLMES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, filed by NATHAN WIRTZ. (Filing fee $400, receipt number IP067994) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(AKH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WIRTZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NATHAN WIRTZ
Represented By: John Joseph Coomes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOYE HOLMES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?