WHITE v. YANG ACUPUNCTURE et al
| BRENDA L. WHITE |
| WEI YANG and YANG ACUPUNCTURE |
| 1:2020cv00813 |
| March 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| James R Sweeney |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff shall have through May 4, 2020 to file an amended complaint or other-wise show cause why this action should not be dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. In doing so, Plaintiff must clearly identify the citizenship of herself, Defendant Wei Yang, and Defendant Yang Acupuncture. Failure to do so in the time allotted will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice. ****SEE ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION**** (Copy to Plaintiff via U.S. mail). Signed by Judge James R. Sweeney II on 3/30/2020. (JDC)
|
| Filing 4 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by BRENDA L. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(JDC) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff BRENDA L. WHITE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against WEI YANG, YANG ACUPUNCTURE, filed by BRENDA L. WHITE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
