MCCLESKEY, et al v. LAPPE CEMENT FINISHING, INC.
| INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE and MARK MCCLESKEY |
| LAPPE CEMENT FINISHING, INC. |
| 1:2020cv02243 |
| August 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| James R Sweeney |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to LAPPE CEMENT FINISHING, INC. (DJH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald D. Schwartz on behalf of Plaintiffs INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE. (Schwartz, Donald) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LAPPE CEMENT FINISHING, INC., filed by MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6151220) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Memorandum of Agreement, #3 Proposed Summons)(Schwartz, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
