VOELKER v. ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC et al
| JOHN VOELKER |
| POOJA KILARU and ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC |
| 1:2020cv02367 |
| September 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Tim A Baker |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN TENDERED, filed by Defendant POOJA KILARU . (Lasher, Cynthia) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE Plaintiff's Response to Order Setting Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference, filed by Plaintiff JOHN VOELKER. (Ladendorf, Mark) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE Plainitff's Response to Court Re Local Rule 81-1, re #15 Order, filed by Plaintiff JOHN VOELKER. (Ladendorf, Mark) |
Filing 15
ORDER - Defendant Enterprise RAC Company of Baltimore, LLC ("Enterprise") removed this action to this Court on September 11, 2020, alleging that this Court has diversity jurisdiction over this matter. [Filing No. 1.] Local Rule 81-1 provides: Within 30 days after the filing of the notice of removal, every plaintiff who has not filed a motion to remand must file a statement responding to the notice of removal's allegations as to the citizenship of the parties and the amount in controversy. If the plaintiff lacks sufficient information upon which to form a belief about those allegations despite meeting and conferring in good faith with the removing party about them, the plaintiff may so state. Although more than 30 days have passed since the filing of the Notice of Removal, Plaintiff has not filed a response as required by Local Rule 81-1. The Court ORDERS Plaintiff to comply with Local Rule 81-1 by October, 28, 2020. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/14/2020.(JDH)
|
|
Filing 14
SCHEDULING ORDER - Telephonic Initial Pretrial Conference is set for 11/5/2020 09:00 AM (Eastern Time) before Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 10/9/2020. *** SEE ORDER *** (CKM)
|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Second Amended Complaint and RJT, filed by Defendant POOJA KILARU. (Lasher, Cynthia) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark C. Ladendorf on behalf of Plaintiff JOHN VOELKER. (Ladendorf, Mark) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Cynthia Elaine Lasher on behalf of Defendant POOJA KILARU. (Lasher, Cynthia) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley J. Wombles on behalf of Defendant POOJA KILARU. (Wombles, Bradley) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint , filed by ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC.(Hamilton, Jessica) |
| Filing 8 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson. (JDH) |
| Filing 7 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie B. Pollie on behalf of Defendant ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC. (Pollie, Leslie) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing by ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC (Hamilton, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC. (Hamilton, Jessica) |
| Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury, filed by Defendant ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC. (Hamilton, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jessica N. Hamilton on behalf of Defendant ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC. (Hamilton, Jessica) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from HENDRICKS COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1, case number 32D01-2007-CT-117, filed by ENTERPRISE RAC COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, LLC. (Filing fee $400, receipt number 0756-6175875) (Attachments: #1 State Court Record, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hamilton, Jessica) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
