SURZYCKI v. LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
Plaintiff: JANE DOE and ALEKSANDRA SURZYCKI
Defendant: LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
Case Number: 1:2020cv02403
Filed: September 16, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: James Patrick Hanlon
Referring Judge: Doris L Pryor
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT AND ORDER - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about the rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Pro se litigants should read this Notice carefully before filing anything further with the Court. All litigants are expected to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and this Court's Local Rules. Plaintiffs have a duty to update their addresses. The plaintiff shall report any change of address within thirty (30) days of any change while this action remains pending. The Court must be able to locate and communicate with the plaintiff. If the plaintiff fails to keep the Court informed of her current address, the action may be subject to dismissal. The plaintiff shall have through November 20, 2020 to provide the Court with her contact information, including an address where she can be reached. If the plaintiff does not do so, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice. In addition, this district's Local Rule 10-1 mandates that a plaintiff seeking to proceed anonymously must, at the time of filing the initial pleading, file under seal a notice of intention to seek leave to proceed anonymously and disclose the plaintiff's true name. S.D. L.R. 10-1(a). Contemporaneously with the notice, the plaintiff must file a motion to proceed anonymously and serve each opposing party with both the notice and the motion within seven days of plaintiff has filed neither notice nor a motion to proceed under a pseudonym, the Court directs the clerk to replace "Jane Doe" as Plaintiff with "Aleksandra Surzycki." Because the Plaintiff has not provided her address, the Clerk cannot send Plaintiff a copy of this Order. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 10/20/2020.(DWH) Modified on 10/21/2020 (DWH).
September 16, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO)
September 16, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC, filed by JANE DOE. (No fee paid with this filing) (REO)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SURZYCKI v. LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LIVEOPS AGENT SERVICES, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALEKSANDRA SURZYCKI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?