DUKE v. COOK et al
Plaintiff: MARK A. DUKE
Defendant: WARDEN, COOK and SCREENING OFFICER OF
Case Number: 1:2020cv02440
Filed: September 22, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Presiding Judge: Tim A Baker
Referring Judge: Tanya Walton Pratt
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 3, 2020 Filing 6 RECEIPT #IP071394 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $13.00, paid by Plaintiff. (REO)
October 23, 2020 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against COOK, SCREENING OFFICER OF 12/9/19, WARDEN, filed by MARK A. DUKE. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons)(NAD)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENTRY - GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, DISMISSING COMPLAINT, AND DIRECTING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. For the reasons discussed in Part II, the complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Mr. Duke shall have through October 26, 2020, to file an amended complaint that resolves the deficiencies discussed in this Order or otherwise show cause why this action should not be dismissed. Mr. Duke shall also have through October 26, 2020, to pay his initial partial filing fee as directed in Part I. If Mr. Duke fails to comply with these orders, the Court may dismiss this action without further warning or opportunity to show cause. (See Order.) Copy to Plaintiff via US Mail. Signed by Judge Tanya Walton Pratt on 9/28/2020.(NAD)
September 23, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC)
September 22, 2020 Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH)
September 22, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COOK, SCREENING OFFICER OF 12/9/19, and WARDEN, filed by MARK A. DUKE. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Certificate of Inmate Trust Fund Account, #2 Exhibit B Proposed Summons)(DJH)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DUKE v. COOK et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WARDEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COOK
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SCREENING OFFICER OF
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARK A. DUKE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?