HATCHER v. USA
| LANCE L. HATCHER, JR. |
| USA |
| 1:2020cv02754 |
| October 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Jane Magnus-Stinson |
| Doris L Pryor |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER - granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time. The United States shall have to and including March 9, 2021, to file its response to the Petitioner's 2255 motion and brief in support. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 12/3/2020. (NAD)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to March 9, 2021 in which to #3 Order to Show Cause , filed by Respondent USA. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Blackington, Bradley) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Bradley A. Blackington on behalf of Respondent USA. (Blackington, Bradley) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - 1. The clerk shall forward a copy of this Entry to the United States Attorney for this District. The United States is notified of the filing of the petitioner's motion for relief and memorandum in support pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. 2. The United States shall have until December 9, 2020, in which to answer the allegations of the motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255, and the petitioner shall have twenty-eight (28) calendar days after service of the answer in which to reply. 3. If the United States' answer refers to briefs, filings, or transcripts of the prior proceedings that are not available in the Court's electronic records, the United States is directed to furnish them along with its answer. See Rule 5(c) of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Any motion for an extension of time to file an answer should include a statement notifying the Court whether and when a request for production of transcripts has been made to the court reporter. 4. Any motion for an extension of time filed by the respondent must include the petitioner's current earliest possible release date. Show Cause Response due by 12/9/2020. Copy to Lance L. Hatcher, Jr. via U.S. mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 10/29/2020.(JDH)
|
| Filing 2 BRIEF/MEMORANDUM in Support, re #1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255), filed by Petitioner LANCE L. HATCHER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(AKH) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255), filed by LANCE L. HATCHER, JR. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: HATCHER v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LANCE L. HATCHER, JR. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: USA | |
| Represented By: | Bradley A. Blackington |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
