ASHER-BUTLER v. SUPERIOR COURT I et al
ALLEN L. ASHER-BUTLER |
SUPERIOR COURT I and BARTHOLOMEW CO. |
1:2020cv02951 |
November 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Request for Fast and Speedy resolution, filed by Petitioner ALLEN L. ASHER-BUTLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 5 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS - Allen L. Asher-Butler, a pre-trial detainee in Decatur County, Indiana, has filed a 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition for writ of habeas corpus and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, dkt. #4 , is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 12/10/2020. Copy to Petitioner via US Mail. (DWH) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Petitioner ALLEN L. ASHER-BUTLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 3 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by ALLEN L. ASHER-BUTLER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ALLEN L. ASHER-BUTLER. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (AKH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.