FRYE et al v. Independence Contracting LLC
| DAVID FRYE and INDIANA LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION, TRAINING, AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TRUST FUNDS |
| Independence Contracting LLC and INDEPENDENCE CONTRACTING, LLC |
| 1:2020cv03100 |
| December 1, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Mark J Dinsmore |
| James R Sweeney |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1131 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to INDEPENDENCE CONTRACTING, LLC. (AKH) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons submitted for issuance by the clerk as to INDEPENDENCE CONTRACTING, LLC. (Gath, Neil) |
| Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (AKH) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil E. Gath on behalf of Plaintiffs DAVID FRYE, INDIANA LABORERS WELFARE, PENSION, TRAINING, AND DEFINED CONTRIBUTION TRUST FUNDS. (Gath, Neil) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6300104) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Acceptance of Highway Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B - Signed Residential Agreement, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C- Highway CBA, #4 Proposed Summons, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gath, Neil) Modified on 12/2/2020 (AKH). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
