STATE OF INDIANA v. TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC.
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA and STATE OF INDIANA |
TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC. |
TODD ROKITA |
1:2021cv00522 |
March 5, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
James Patrick Hanlon |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 ORDER GRANTING AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT DECREE - It is therefore ORDERED, that the Clerk shall show the Consent Decree entered and approved by the Court as of this date. This cause of action shall be removed from the Court's docket, each party to bear its own costs and fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 3/17/2021.(AAS) |
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman: Status Conference held on 3/16/2021. Parties were represented by counsel. No further orders are entered at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. (TMB) |
Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC. identifying Corporate Parent TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION for TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC... (Bina, Mark) |
Filing 10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Status Conference set for 3/16/2021 at 01:00 PM (Eastern Time) Telephonic before Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 3/16/2021.(TMB) Modified date on 3/16/2021 (TMB). |
Filing 9 NOTICE to File Corporate Disclosure Statement to TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC.. (RAGS) (JRB) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark W. Bina on behalf of Defendant TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC.. (Bina, Mark) |
Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge The Honorable Matthew P. Brookman to conduct all proceedings and order the entry of a final judgment in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73. Should this case be reassigned to a magistrate judge other than the magistrate judge assigned the date of this order, any attorney or party of record may object within 30 days of such reassignment. If no objection is filed, the consent will remain in effect. This action's case number SHALL be amended as shown above to reflect this referral to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge James Patrick Hanlon on 3/12/2021.(MAC) |
Filing 6 Amended MOTION UNOPPOSED TO APPROVE CONSENT DECREE, filed by Plaintiff STATE OF INDIANA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Consent Decree, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shumaker, Heather) |
Filing 5 JOINT CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by All Plaintiffs. (Shumaker, Heather) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 3 ***AMENDED MOTION APPEARS AT #6 ***Unopposed MOTION TO APPROVE CONSENT DECREE, filed by Plaintiff STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Consent Decree, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Shumaker, Heather) Modified text on 3/16/2021 (TMB). |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather M. Shumaker on behalf of Plaintiff STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA. (Shumaker, Heather) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against TOYOTA INDUSTRIES NORTH AMERICA, INC., filed by STATE OF INDIANA EX REL ROKITA. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6444429) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons - Waiver of Service of Summons)(Shumaker, Heather) Modified on 3/8/2021 (REO). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.