WATSON v. ZATECKY et al
KEVIN LAMONT WATSON |
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DUSHAN ZATECKY, STEPHEN HILL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WILLIAMS, MARTIAL KENISER, JACKSON and DAVID WALLACE |
1:2021cv00994 |
April 21, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Matthew P Brookman |
Jane Magnus-Stinson |
Prisoner Petitions - Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ORDER Directing Monthly Payments be made from Prison Account of KEVIN LAMONT WATSON, 264199 - Plaintiff's custodian is directed to withhold sums from the inmate trust account of KEVIN LAMONT WATSON, 264199, and to forward such sums to the Clerk of this Court at 46 East Ohio Street, Room 105, Indianapolis, Indiana 46204, consistent with paragraph 2 of this Entry. The appropriate cause number, 1:21-CV-00994-JMS-MPB, should be placed on each payment sent to the Clerk. As of the issuance of this Order, the balance of the filing fee still due in this case is $311.33. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 5/26/2021.(AAS) |
Filing 8 CONSENT to Prisoner E-Service by KEVIN LAMONT WATSON located at PENDLETON CF. Pursuant to General Order 2013-1, documents submitted by KEVIN LAMONT WATSON to the court for filing will generate a Notice of Electronic Filing that will constitute official service upon registered users of CM/ECF. If any parties to the case are not registered CM/ECF users, the Clerk of the Court will mail the document via U.S. Postal Service on behalf of the inmate. NOTE: The E-Filing Program does not affect the obligation of other parties to serve copies of documents in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (MAC) |
Filing 7 RECEIPT #IP074005 for initial partial filing fee in the amount of $38.67, paid by Plaintiff. (REO) |
Filing 6 CONSENT to Jurisdiction to US Magistrate Judge by KEVIN LAMONT WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Envelope). (MAC) |
Filing 5 ENTRY - granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee of Thirty-Eight Dollars and Sixty-Seven Cents ($38.67). He shall have through May 24, 2021, to pay this sum to the clerk of the district court. Failure to pay the initial partial filing fee as directed in this Entry could result in the dismissal of the action for failure to comply with Court orders and failure to prosecute. (See Entry). Copy to Plaintiff via US mail. Signed by Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson on 4/23/2021. (AKH) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro se Litigant - The following information is provided to pro se litigants to inform them about rules and procedures governing how they communicate with the Court. Copy distributed to Plaintiff via US mail. (TMC) |
Filing 3 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (REO) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by Plaintiff KEVIN LAMONT WATSON. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Transaction history, #2 Envelope)(REO) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against STEPHEN HILL, JACKSON, MARTIAL KENISER, PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DAVID WALLACE, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC, WILLIAMS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, filed by KEVIN LAMONT WATSON. (No fee paid with this filing) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit part 1 - Grievance documents, #2 Exhibit part 2 - Grievance documents, #3 Envelope)(REO) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.