MCCLESKEY et al v. FLORES
MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY and INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS PENSION FUNDS |
ARTURO FLORES d/b/a FLORES STUCCO, MASONRY & DEMOLITION LLC and ARTURO FLORES doing business as FLORES STUCCO, MASONRY & DEMOLITION, LLC |
1:2021cv02162 |
August 2, 2021 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Mario Garcia |
James R Sweeney |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES before Judge James R. Sweeney II. (JDC) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (DJH) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to ARTURO FLORES. (DJH) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Donald D. Schwartz on behalf of Plaintiffs INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS, MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE. (Schwartz, Donald) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARTURO FLORES d/b/a FLORES STUCCO, MASONRY & DEMOLITION LLC, filed by MARK MCCLESKEY, TRUSTEE, INDIANA STATE COUNCIL OF PLASTERERS AND CEMENT MASONS HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION FUNDS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number 0756-6682495) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Memorandum of Agreement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Schwartz, Donald) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.