BROWN v. THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
| PAUL ERIC BROWN |
| THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2, JOHN DOE OFFICER 3, JOHN DOE OFFICER 5 and CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY |
| JOHN DOE OFFICER 4 |
| 1:2021cv02864 |
| November 17, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
| Sarah Evans Barker |
| Matthew P Brookman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Service of Initial Disclosures , filed by Defendants CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY, JOHN DOE OFFICER 1, JOHN DOE OFFICER 2, JOHN DOE OFFICER 3, JOHN DOE OFFICER 4, JOHN DOE OFFICER 5. (Gerber, Tara) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Katherine Anne Piscione on behalf of Plaintiff PAUL ERIC BROWN. (Piscione, Katherine) |
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE - The above case is hereby assigned for a TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE on FEBRUARY 10, 2022 at 10:00 a.m., Indianapolis time (EST), before the Honorable Matthew P. Brookman, United States Magistrate Judge. The information needed for counsel to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by a separate notification. No fewer than seven (7) days before the IPTC, counsel must file a proposed CMP. SEE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Matthew P. Brookman on 11/19/2021.(AAS)
|
| Filing 7 Defendants ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Jury Demand , filed by CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY.(Gerber, Tara) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Regarding State Court Motions, filed by Defendant CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY (Gerber, Tara) |
| Filing 5 Submission of Signature Requirement re #4 Notice of Appearance by CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY. (Willfond, Adam) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Tara Lynn Gerber on behalf of Defendant CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY. (Gerber, Tara) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Tara Lynn Gerber on behalf of Defendant CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY. (Gerber, Tara) |
| Filing 2 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (LMK) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Marion Superior Court, case number 49D04-2110-CT-034371, filed by THE CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-6846146) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 State Court Record Docket Report, Paul Eric Brown Notice of Appearance, Complaint for Damages, Summons Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Marion County, Certificate of Issuance of Summons Consolidated City of Indianapolis and Marion County, Certified Mail Returned, Appearance for Consolidated City Of Indianapolis and Marion County, and John Doe Officers 1-5, Defendant's Notice of Automatic Enlargement of Time, Defendant City Motion to Withdraw Appearance for John Does 1-5 (Adam Willfond), Defendant City Motion to Withdraw Appearance for John Does 1-5 (Tara Gerber), Order Granting Defendant City Motion to Withdraw Appearance for John Does 1-5 (Adam Willfond, Order Granting Defendant City Motion to Withdraw Appearance for John Does 1-5 (Tara Gerber), #3 State Court Record Plaintiff's Complaint)(Gerber, Tara) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
