AKERS v. THE BUREAUS, INC.
JALEN AKERS |
THE BUREAUS, INC. |
1:2022cv01206 |
June 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana |
Tim A Baker |
Tanya Walton Pratt |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER SETTING TELEPHONIC INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE - This case is assigned for a telephonic initial pretrial conference before United States Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on September 26, 2022, at 10:30 a.m. (Eastern Time). Parties shall participate in this conference by counsel. The information needed by counsel of record to participate in this telephonic conference will be provided by separate notification. **SEE ORDER**(MGG) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting Defendant's #7 Motion for Extension of Time to File response to complaint to 8/24/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Tim A. Baker on 7/28/2022. (SWM) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Schultz on behalf of Defendant THE BUREAUS, INC.. (Schultz, David) |
Filing 8 **PLEASE DISREGARD - DOCKETED IN ERROR** NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Schultz on behalf of Defendant THE BUREAUS, INC.. (Schultz, David) Modified on 7/28/2022 (AKH). |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to 8/24/2022 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Defendant THE BUREAUS, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer Jay Kalas on behalf of Defendant THE BUREAUS, INC.. (Kalas, Jennifer) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Personal Service, filed by JALEN AKERS. THE BUREAUS, INC. served on 6/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit of Service)(Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 4 MAGISTRATE JUDGE's NOTICE of Availability to Exercise Jurisdiction issued. (BRR) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to THE BUREAUS, INC. (BRR) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by John Thomas Steinkamp on behalf of Plaintiff JALEN AKERS. (Steinkamp, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Damages against THE BUREAUS, INC., filed by JALEN AKERS. (Filing fee $402, receipt number AINSDC-7148274) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Debt Collector License Information, #2 Exhibit 2 - The March 29, 2021, and March 31, 2021, letters sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #3 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Affidavit, #4 Exhibit A - Relevant pages of Plaintiff's August 19, 2021, Experian credit report, #5 Exhibit 4 - The August 30, 2021, letter sent by Plaintiff's Counsel, #6 Civil Cover Sheet, #7 Proposed Summons)(Steinkamp, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Indiana Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: AKERS v. THE BUREAUS, INC. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: JALEN AKERS | |
Represented By: | John Thomas Steinkamp |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: THE BUREAUS, INC. | |
Represented By: | David M. Schultz |
Represented By: | Jennifer Jay Kalas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.